Robust Linear Models

In [1]:
%matplotlib inline

from __future__ import print_function
import numpy as np
import statsmodels.api as sm
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from statsmodels.sandbox.regression.predstd import wls_prediction_std
/build/statsmodels-wzY4ON/statsmodels-0.8.0/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_statsmodels/build/statsmodels/compat/pandas.py:56: FutureWarning: The pandas.core.datetools module is deprecated and will be removed in a future version. Please use the pandas.tseries module instead.
  from pandas.core import datetools

Estimation

Load data:

In [2]:
data = sm.datasets.stackloss.load()
data.exog = sm.add_constant(data.exog)
/build/statsmodels-wzY4ON/statsmodels-0.8.0/.pybuild/cpython3_3.7_statsmodels/build/statsmodels/datasets/utils.py:100: FutureWarning: arrays to stack must be passed as a "sequence" type such as list or tuple. Support for non-sequence iterables such as generators is deprecated as of NumPy 1.16 and will raise an error in the future.
  exog = np.column_stack(data[field] for field in exog_name)

Huber's T norm with the (default) median absolute deviation scaling

In [3]:
huber_t = sm.RLM(data.endog, data.exog, M=sm.robust.norms.HuberT())
hub_results = huber_t.fit()
print(hub_results.params)
print(hub_results.bse)
print(hub_results.summary(yname='y',
            xname=['var_%d' % i for i in range(len(hub_results.params))]))
[-41.02649835   0.82938433   0.92606597  -0.12784672]
[9.79189854 0.11100521 0.30293016 0.12864961]
                    Robust linear Model Regression Results                    
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable:                      y   No. Observations:                   21
Model:                            RLM   Df Residuals:                       17
Method:                          IRLS   Df Model:                            3
Norm:                          HuberT                                         
Scale Est.:                       mad                                         
Cov Type:                          H1                                         
Date:                Fri, 08 Mar 2019                                         
Time:                        05:01:29                                         
No. Iterations:                    19                                         
==============================================================================
                 coef    std err          z      P>|z|      [0.025      0.975]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
var_0        -41.0265      9.792     -4.190      0.000     -60.218     -21.835
var_1          0.8294      0.111      7.472      0.000       0.612       1.047
var_2          0.9261      0.303      3.057      0.002       0.332       1.520
var_3         -0.1278      0.129     -0.994      0.320      -0.380       0.124
==============================================================================

If the model instance has been used for another fit with different fit
parameters, then the fit options might not be the correct ones anymore .

Huber's T norm with 'H2' covariance matrix

In [4]:
hub_results2 = huber_t.fit(cov="H2")
print(hub_results2.params)
print(hub_results2.bse)
[-41.02649835   0.82938433   0.92606597  -0.12784672]
[9.08950419 0.11945975 0.32235497 0.11796313]

Andrew's Wave norm with Huber's Proposal 2 scaling and 'H3' covariance matrix

In [5]:
andrew_mod = sm.RLM(data.endog, data.exog, M=sm.robust.norms.AndrewWave())
andrew_results = andrew_mod.fit(scale_est=sm.robust.scale.HuberScale(), cov="H3")
print('Parameters: ', andrew_results.params)
Parameters:  [-40.8817957    0.79276138   1.04857556  -0.13360865]

See help(sm.RLM.fit) for more options and module sm.robust.scale for scale options

Comparing OLS and RLM

Artificial data with outliers:

In [6]:
nsample = 50
x1 = np.linspace(0, 20, nsample)
X = np.column_stack((x1, (x1-5)**2))
X = sm.add_constant(X)
sig = 0.3   # smaller error variance makes OLS<->RLM contrast bigger
beta = [5, 0.5, -0.0]
y_true2 = np.dot(X, beta)
y2 = y_true2 + sig*1. * np.random.normal(size=nsample)
y2[[39,41,43,45,48]] -= 5   # add some outliers (10% of nsample)

Example 1: quadratic function with linear truth

Note that the quadratic term in OLS regression will capture outlier effects.

In [7]:
res = sm.OLS(y2, X).fit()
print(res.params)
print(res.bse)
print(res.predict())
[ 5.10134815  0.49690878 -0.01090296]
[0.45255925 0.06986904 0.00618233]
[ 4.82877415  5.07427953  5.31615211  5.55439188  5.78899884  6.019973
  6.24731435  6.4710229   6.69109863  6.90754157  7.12035169  7.32952901
  7.53507353  7.73698523  7.93526413  8.12991023  8.32092351  8.50830399
  8.69205167  8.87216654  9.0486486   9.22149785  9.3907143   9.55629795
  9.71824878  9.87656681 10.03125203 10.18230445 10.32972406 10.47351087
 10.61366486 10.75018605 10.88307444 11.01233002 11.13795279 11.25994275
 11.37829991 11.49302427 11.60411581 11.71157455 11.81540049 11.91559361
 12.01215393 12.10508145 12.19437616 12.28003806 12.36206715 12.44046344
 12.51522692 12.5863576 ]

Estimate RLM:

In [8]:
resrlm = sm.RLM(y2, X).fit()
print(resrlm.params)
print(resrlm.bse)
[5.04115334e+00 4.77349665e-01 1.20229125e-04]
[0.14718618 0.02272356 0.00201068]

Draw a plot to compare OLS estimates to the robust estimates:

In [9]:
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(12,8))
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax.plot(x1, y2, 'o',label="data")
ax.plot(x1, y_true2, 'b-', label="True")
prstd, iv_l, iv_u = wls_prediction_std(res)
ax.plot(x1, res.fittedvalues, 'r-', label="OLS")
ax.plot(x1, iv_u, 'r--')
ax.plot(x1, iv_l, 'r--')
ax.plot(x1, resrlm.fittedvalues, 'g.-', label="RLM")
ax.legend(loc="best")
Out[9]:
<matplotlib.legend.Legend at 0x7fe9a34ba128>

Example 2: linear function with linear truth

Fit a new OLS model using only the linear term and the constant:

In [10]:
X2 = X[:,[0,1]] 
res2 = sm.OLS(y2, X2).fit()
print(res2.params)
print(res2.bse)
[5.5408042  0.38787917]
[0.38599273 0.03325869]

Estimate RLM:

In [11]:
resrlm2 = sm.RLM(y2, X2).fit()
print(resrlm2.params)
print(resrlm2.bse)
[5.03581237 0.47852949]
[0.12042232 0.01037607]

Draw a plot to compare OLS estimates to the robust estimates:

In [12]:
prstd, iv_l, iv_u = wls_prediction_std(res2)

fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8,6))
ax.plot(x1, y2, 'o', label="data")
ax.plot(x1, y_true2, 'b-', label="True")
ax.plot(x1, res2.fittedvalues, 'r-', label="OLS")
ax.plot(x1, iv_u, 'r--')
ax.plot(x1, iv_l, 'r--')
ax.plot(x1, resrlm2.fittedvalues, 'g.-', label="RLM")
legend = ax.legend(loc="best")